
This chapter examines what is known from the research literature and the reported cases about educator sexual misconduct towards students, including the nature and extent of the misconduct, the characteristics of offenders and victims, student disclosures of offences, and the impact of teacher sexual misconduct on students. Certain myths or stereotypical assumptions which serve to hinder effective identification and prevention are also examined. These include the notion that truthful disclosures will be immediate, that only a pedophile would sexually abuse a young child, and that outwardly minor offences cannot leave emotional consequences that extend into adulthood.
Studying covert behaviour is never easy because numerous cases are never discovered by authorities. Many cases remain undisclosed. Even where complaints are disclosed, it may not be possible to substantiate them, even if truthful.
However, during the course of this review, accounts of teacher-student sexual misconduct in Ontario and Canada, as documented in reported criminal cases, disciplinary and arbitration decisions and media accounts, indicate the following:
Moreover, a number of studies from the United States indicate that a high number of students report having been the target of some sort of sexual misconduct by a teacher.
As both teachers' unions and school boards have properly stressed, the incidence of sexual misconduct is small relative to the large number of teachers and students in our school system. However, the incidence is certainly frequent enough and serious enough to deserve more attention than it presently receives.
It is evident from the relevant research literature that there is no typical offence or offender. While sexual misconduct by teachers is perpetrated overwhelmingly by males, and overwhelmingly against females, it occurs in all combinations of gender. There is no single "molester profile", and the origins of sexually abusive behaviours vary. The popular conception that anyone who sexually abuses a child is a pedophile is simply wrong. In fact, teachers who engage in sexual misconduct with children and adolescents are not pedophiles in most cases. Terms such as "boundary violators", "romantic/bad judgment abusers" or "situational offenders" have been used to describe different types of abusers.
Students abused by teachers probably delay disclosure by reason of deference to an authority figure, embarrassment, guilt and fear--fear of retaliation by the offender, fear that no one will believe them, fear of being blamed and fear of some sort of punishment. A child's desire to comply with the requests of an adult he or she trusts and by whom he or she wishes to be accepted is another inhibitor of disclosure. The genuine affection a child may have for the teacher, especially one who promotes the "special relationship" and who has spent a great deal of time in the grooming phase, should not be underestimated. Studies of child disclosure have contributed greatly to our understanding of disclosure. For example, it is estimated that only 30 percent of sexually abused children disclose their abuse during their childhoods.
The impact of sexual victimization on children has been widely researched and reported on in the mental health literature. The impact is often less correlated with the severity or intrusiveness of the sexual behaviour than with the pre-abuse relationship to the abuser, the vulnerability of the victim or the way in which disclosure of abuse was responded to. Accordingly, a seemingly minor incident of sexual touching by a close and trusted adult can have a profound and lasting impact.
It must be concluded that the DeLuca case is neither aberrant or out of date. Teacher sexual misconduct is sufficiently prevalent to warrant special attention. Arguments to the contrary should not be allowed to forestall efforts to understand the problem, and actively address it.

This site is maintained by the Government of Ontario
Privacy |
Important Notices
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2007
This website has been created as a public service by the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information presented is current and accurate. However, users of this site should verify the information before making decisions or acting upon it. The Ministry of the Attorney General does not provide legal advice to the public. Materials on this website can be made available in Braille, large print and audio or electronic formats upon request.