To view PDF files, you will require Adobe Acrobat® Reader.
You can download this free software from Adobe's Web site.
Report Of The Review Of Large And Complex Criminal Case Procedures – Print Version, PDF 883KB
- History of the Review
- The Context and Culture in which Long Complex Cases have Arisen
- Do We Need to Begin with a Definition of "Long Complex Cases?"
- The Legal or Law Reform Causes of Long Complex Trials
- Within this Changed Legal Context, the Justice System Needs to do Better
- The Focus of our Recommendations
- Disclosure and the Pre-Charge Relationship between the Police and the Crown
- Introduction
- The Solutions to the Issues on the Crown/Police Side
- Closer Police and Crown Collaboration at the Pre-Charge Stage
- Can the Crown Giving Pre-Charge Advice Play a Role in the Prosecution Once Charges are Laid?
- Electronic Disclosure in a Comprehensive Standard Format
- Vetting, Transcribing and Paying for Disclosure
- Introduction
- Who is Responsible for Vetting or Editing the Disclosure Brief?
- Who Should Transcribe Relevant Taped Interviews and Intercepts?
- Who Should Pay for Disclosure?
- The Timeliness of Disclosure
- The Solutions to the Issues on the Defence Side: Requests for Materials Outside the Investigative File
- Judicial Case Management, Especially at the Pre-trial Stage
- The History of Judicial Case Management in Ontario
- The Need for Greater Case Management Powers
- Suggested Models for Reform
- The Proposals Emerging from this Review
- The Federal Provincial Territorial Working Group Proposals
- The Common Law Case Management Powers of the Trial Judge and The Need for Expertise
- Judicial Case Management in the Ontario Court when the Case is Proceeding to Preliminary Inquiry
- Managing the Bail Hearing
- The Power to Require Admissions
- Introduction
- Counsel's Ethical Duties
- Requiring the Crown to Accept Admissions Offered by the Defence
- Requiring the Defence to Make Admissions of Facts not Legitimately in Dispute
- Long Complex Terrorism Cases
- Legal Aid
- Introduction
- Available Models for Reform
- The First Approach to Reform: Paying Higher Fees to a Short List of Highly Qualified Counsel
- The Second Approach to Reform: Enhanced Oversight of the Budget for Long Complex Cases
- The Statutory Scheme
- The Independence of the Bar
- Improving Front End Management and Oversight of the Conduct of the Defence
- Improving Post Trial Responses Where the Case Appears to have been Conducted Contrary to the Statutory Purpose of the Legal Aid Services Act
- Developing the Next Generation of Leading Counsel
- Advising, Directing and, Where Necessary, Disciplining Counsel for Both the Crown and the Defence
- Introduction
- Inexperience, Lack of Guidance, Poor Judgment and Poor Advocacy
- Oversight and Guidance of Crown Counsel in Long Complex Cases
- Oversight and Guidance of Defence Counsel in Long Complex Cases
- Remedial Responses to Professional Misconduct in Long Complex Trials
- Introduction
- Judicial Responses to Court Room Misconduct
- The Law Society's Response to Court Room Misconduct
- The Attorney General and Legal Aid's Responses to Court Room Misconduct
- The Particular Problem of Incompetence
- Post-Mortems of the Justice System's Performance When a Long Complex Case is Seen to Have Failed
- Managing the Unrepresented Accused
- Introduction
- Appointing Amicus Curiae
- Appointing Counsel
- Conclusion
- Appendix A: Review Participants
- Appendix B: Recommendations
Next Page >